'Complete Keyboard Works, Series II' 'By Francois Couperin (1668-1733). For solo keyboard. Piano Collection. Dover Edition. Classical Period.

Forum rules Title format: [PDF/JPG tag] Composer's surname, forename - op.xx/xx Title - tags (if known) e.g. [PDF] Albeniz, Isaac - op.47 Sevilla or [PDF] Quantz, J. - op.02/02 Duetto - Duo (For more than one forename, just give initials.) or [PDF] Anon. - Packington's Pound (Use Anon. For all anonymous or traditional pieces.) Username may replace Composer's surname and forename for your own compositions. For Giuliani the opus number should be 3 digits ( op.048) and for Bach the BWV number should be 4 digits ( BWV 0820). For more details see instructions.

I've always been fascinated by this piece. Not because of the title, but because I could never believe that someone wrote something so 'modern' sounding so long ago. It could have been written yesterday! Thank you so much for your arrangement. I've loved this piece ever since Parkening recorded it and I ran right out and bought his arrangement as soon as it hit the stores.

Unfortunately, I'm not Parkening. There are some spots that just tie my fingers in knots. Later, I found another arrangement, but it was even harder! You seem to have very cleverly solved these problem spots and produced an arrangement that is assuredly playable. As Delcamp's resident editor, I found two spots where the fingerings might be typos: At measure 30, it looks like you meant for the 3rd finger to stay on the C the whole time right?

At measure 46, you probably mean for the 2nd half of the measure to be fingered the same way as the second half of measure 44? That's all I could find. Brilliant job! Now I can play this piece! Hallo Les, thank you for sharing your work with us!

It is a pleasure to play this piece. As you have suggested, a fine walking tempo for the halves seems to me best for getting the right mood out of this lovely Rondo. In my opinion, the piano- and clavecin-versions which are played too fast are merely a hurry through the score. Last but not least, I agree with better to have a readble score and have in mind to let ring the notes. It is like folk picking, indeed. Trying myself serveral keys for getting an optimal fingering C-Major seems to be the least worse Only, I would like to suggest a slightly different fingering: If you like try in bar 2 no barre and the g with 2, in bar 4 a with 3, c with 2, f with 2, in bar 6 again no barre and the g with 1, d with 3, high g with 4 and the f with 2. Thank you again for your fine work!

Regards, Marco.

Which method of viewing music should I use? Score Exchange has two methods to display previews of music: seView which uses regular html and javascipt and the Scorch plug-in from Avid which needs to be downloaded and installed onto your computer. Both have advantages and disadvantages: seView seView, is the most compatible option. You should be able to view music on all modern web browsers including most mobile devices. Even if your device does not support javascript you should still be able to preview at least page one of the music.

Atau jika sibuk, lain waktu juga masih tetap bisa. Cara hack rekening bca. Mengaktifkannya dengan ATM sebenarnya juga bisa. Namun Anda tetap harus ke kantor cabang bank lagi untuk mengambil token atau keyBCA-nya.

You do not need to install any additional software to use seView. Scorch Scorch is a free plug-in from Avid for displaying and printing music.

It can also play the music that you're seeing. As modern web browsers are updated, Scorch is no longer compatible with many browsers. Scorch has never been compatible with mobile devices and some web browsers on Mac computers. If your web browser does not install Scorch automatically, you can. Static preview The static preview shows a basic image of the first page. Interactive preview The interactive preview also shows a preview of the first page, but it's a bit slower to load.